<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There are no a priori best practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/</link>
	<description>Essays on the Continuous Delivery of High Quality Information Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Packlick</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-2268</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Packlick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>Corey,
The term I try to promote is &#039;better practices&#039; Our processes should be in a constant state of improvement thus, there&#039;s no such thing as &#039;best&#039; - which implies the dead-end arrival at a process destination. 
J.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey,<br />
The term I try to promote is &#8216;better practices&#8217; Our processes should be in a constant state of improvement thus, there&#8217;s no such thing as &#8216;best&#8217; &#8211; which implies the dead-end arrival at a process destination.<br />
J.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corporate Coder</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>Corporate Coder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lean Thinking in Software Engineering...&lt;/strong&gt;

Interesting post over on the Lean Software Engineering blog, &quot; There are no a priori best practices...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lean Thinking in Software Engineering&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Interesting post over on the Lean Software Engineering blog, &quot; There are no a priori best practices&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Landes</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1928</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Landes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/#comment-1928</guid>
		<description>Corey, A great post.  To be honest, I am hoping to impart this attitude to our team here.  I believe that there are current best practices.  But in my career, I&#039;ve never been at the best, and stopped.  Maybe that&#039;s just my issue.  But I do not believe we have scratched the surface in delivering software with high quality, quickly. 

I&#039;d love to see any examples you have in how you&#039;ve got that attitude across to your teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corey, A great post.  To be honest, I am hoping to impart this attitude to our team here.  I believe that there are current best practices.  But in my career, I&#8217;ve never been at the best, and stopped.  Maybe that&#8217;s just my issue.  But I do not believe we have scratched the surface in delivering software with high quality, quickly. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see any examples you have in how you&#8217;ve got that attitude across to your teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Ladas</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1899</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Ladas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/#comment-1899</guid>
		<description>John,

That is a good point.  I don&#039;t think many aspire to worse practices, but we should be mindful that worse is a possible outcome of change.  Perhaps that speaks to the value of having a useful set of metrics.

I&#039;ve seen a good deal of complacency:  &quot;the way I do it is the best way, so why change?&quot;  And recently, this seems to be an especially common malady.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>That is a good point.  I don&#8217;t think many aspire to worse practices, but we should be mindful that worse is a possible outcome of change.  Perhaps that speaks to the value of having a useful set of metrics.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a good deal of complacency:  &#8220;the way I do it is the best way, so why change?&#8221;  And recently, this seems to be an especially common malady.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>Actually I think this forgets the practices that are worse than those you are using now.  Those that don&#039;t use a process improvement tool (like PDSA) often adopt a new practice before testing to determine if it really makes things better first.  Changes that are not improvement outnumber those that are improvement - I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think this forgets the practices that are worse than those you are using now.  Those that don&#8217;t use a process improvement tool (like PDSA) often adopt a new practice before testing to determine if it really makes things better first.  Changes that are not improvement outnumber those that are improvement &#8211; I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There are no a priori best practices &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1849</link>
		<dc:creator>There are no a priori best practices &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/#comment-1849</guid>
		<description>[...] Corey Ladas: There are no a priori best practices. There are only the practices you are using now. And practices that are better than the ones you are using now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Corey Ladas: There are no a priori best practices. There are only the practices you are using now. And practices that are better than the ones you are using now. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Test Guy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2 process thoughts</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-1845</link>
		<dc:creator>A Test Guy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2 process thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2008/02/02/there-are-no-a-priori-best-practices/#comment-1845</guid>
		<description>[...] Corey Ladas posted: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Corey Ladas posted: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.461 seconds -->

