<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Striking a different bargain with the business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2007/09/10/striking-a-different-bargain-with-the-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2007/09/10/striking-a-different-bargain-with-the-business/</link>
	<description>Essays on the Continuous Delivery of High Quality Information Systems</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kanban Commitment &#171; AvailAgility</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2007/09/10/striking-a-different-bargain-with-the-business/#comment-2278</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanban Commitment &#171; AvailAgility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2007/09/10/striking-a-different-bargain-with-the-business/#comment-2278</guid>
		<description>[...] Kanban&#160;Commitment In a recent post on kanban-esque scheduling, Brian Marick asked whether using a kanban system to manage software development has enough discipline, and in particular whether there is enough commitment to deliver. I&#8217;ve been working on ways to answer this, and recently came to a conclusion, when David Anderson reminded me that Corey Ladas has already said the same thing, which he described as striking a different bargain with the business. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kanban&nbsp;Commitment In a recent post on kanban-esque scheduling, Brian Marick asked whether using a kanban system to manage software development has enough discipline, and in particular whether there is enough commitment to deliver. I&#8217;ve been working on ways to answer this, and recently came to a conclusion, when David Anderson reminded me that Corey Ladas has already said the same thing, which he described as striking a different bargain with the business. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Throughput, Lead Time, and Deming &#124; Lean Software Engineering</title>
		<link>http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2007/09/10/striking-a-different-bargain-with-the-business/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Throughput, Lead Time, and Deming &#124; Lean Software Engineering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leansoftwareengineering.com/2007/09/10/striking-a-different-bargain-with-the-business/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] the last post, I described a quality-of-service goal that we use to manage the performance of our development [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the last post, I described a quality-of-service goal that we use to manage the performance of our development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.392 seconds -->
